Before Vatican II, marriage was often considered, or at least popularly expressed, as a union of bodies; that is to say, marriage was an exclusive contract by which a man and a woman mutually handed over their bodies for the purpose of acts which led to the procreation of children. Matrimonial jurisprudence was primarily focused on this marital contract. With the advent of Vatican II and its emphasis on the personalist notion of marriage, a new age dawned whereby canonists, especially auditors of the Roman Rota, were henceforth to view marriage as a union of persons. qPersonq is more than a qbodyq; rather, a person is an individual consisting of wants, needs, desires, impulses, hopes and dreams, whose life experience has been shaped by the milieu qcultural, familial, religiousq from which he or she comes. qUnionq is not only simply understood as a qcontractq, but also is now once again recognized as a qcovenantq, a concept which, at least in the Latin Church, was prevalent until the 12th century.255See S. WOYWOD, A Practical Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, vol. I, rev. and enlarged ed. by C. SMITH, New York, Joseph F. Wagner, Inc., 1957, pp. 740-741; L.J. NAU, Manual on the Marriage Laws of the Code of Canon Law, anbsp;...
|Title||:||Canon 1096 on Ignorance with Application to Tribunal and Pastoral Practice|
|Author||:||Girard M. Sherba|
|Publisher||:||Universal-Publishers - 2001|