Although aspects of mineral deposit evaluation advantages and disadvantages of each technique are covered in such texts as McKinstry (1948), so that a judgement can be made as to their Peters (1978), Reedman (1979) and Barnes applicability to a particular deposit and the min (1980), no widely available in-depth treatment of ing method proposed or used. Too often, a lack the subject has been presented. It is thus the of this expertise results in the ore-reserve calcula intention of the present book to produce a text tion being undertaken at head-office or, indeed, by the survey department on the mine, and being which is suitable for both undergraduate and treated as a 'number crunching' or geometric postgraduate students of mining geology and exercise divorced from geology. It is essential mining engineering and which, at the same time, that mine ore-reserves are calculated at the mine is of use to those already following a professional by those geologists who are most closely associ career in the mining industry. An attempt has ated with the local geology and who are thus best been made to present the material in such a way able to influence and/or constrain the calculation.It is thus evident that the moving window method produces a more realistic view of the distribution of mill feed ore in the bench but the ... and the area of each graticule (e.g. A in Figure 3.31) determined by manual planimetry, or by use of a digitizer and suitable software. ... then the mean of the bounding contours, e.g. 6.75 m and 2.25% respectively, for graticule A. The total volume of the deposit is then: Xa#39;.
|Title||:||Mineral Deposit Evaluation|
|Publisher||:||Springer Science & Business Media - 2012-12-06|