Examines why public administrationas literature has failed to justify the professionas legitimacy as an instrument of governance. Michael Harmon employs the literary conceit of a Final Exam, first awrittena in the early 1930s, in a critique of the fieldas answers to the legitimacy question. Because the assumptions that underwrite the question preclude the possibility of a coherent answer, the exam should be canceled and its question rewritten. Envisaging a public administration no longer hostage to the legitimacy question, Harmon explains how the study and practice of public administration might proceed from adolescence to maturity. Drawing chiefly from pragmatist philosophy, he argues that despite the universal rejection of the apolitics/administrationa dichotomy on factual grounds, the pseudo-problem of legitimacy nonetheless persists in the guise of four related conceptual dualisms: 1) values and facts, 2) thinking and doing, 3) ends and means, and 4) theory and practice. Collectively, these dualisms demand an impossible answer to the practical question of how we might live, and govern, together in a world of radical uncertainty and interdependence. Only by dissolving them can the legitimacy question (Woodrow Wilsonas ghost) finally be banished, clearing away the theoretical debris that obscures a more vital and useful conception of governance.ministrationa was rarely discussed or even cited in public administrationa#39;s academic literature. ... subtitled A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, was among the Acrst to credit Wilsona#39;s essay as an important early statement of ... that although the separation of governmental functions (politics from administration) was a good thing, separation of political powers was decidedly bad, anbsp;...
|Title||:||Public Administration's Final Exam|
|Author||:||Michael M. Harmon|
|Publisher||:||University of Alabama Press - 2006-11-12|