In Without a Tear Mark H. Bernstein begins with one of our most common and cherished moral beliefs: that it is wrong to intentionally and gratuitously inflict harm on the innocent. Over the course of the book, he shows how this apparently innocuous commitment requires that we drastically revise many of our most common practices involving nonhuman animals._x000B__x000B_Most people who write about our ethical obligations concerning animals base their arguments on emotional appeals or contentious philosophical assumptions; Bernstein, however, argues from reasons but carries little theoretical baggage. He considers the issues in a religious context, where he finds that Judaism in particular has the resources to ground moral obligations to animals. Without a Tear also makes novel use of feminist ethics to add to the case for drawing animals more closely into our ethical world. _x000B__x000B_Bernstein details the realities of factory farms, animal-based research, and hunting fields, and contrasting these chilling facts with our moral imperatives clearly shows the need for fundamental changes to some of our most basic animal institutions. The tightly argued, provocative claims in Without a Tear will be an eye-opening experience for animal lovers, scholars, and people of good faith everywhere.The inordinate number of debasing terms for women clearly shows that our attitudes still need major repair. A similar point applies to hunting terminology. It is telling that hunters tend to characterize their practice as a asporta and refer to themselves as asportsmena and asportswomen.a This is ... All the parties have some chance of winning, with the winner typically rewarded with money, a trophy, or a medal.
|Title||:||Without a Tear|
|Author||:||Mark H. Bernstein|
|Publisher||:||University of Illinois Press - 2004-05-27|